Iwould go with the Kayano 25’s. As it’s been mentioned, they’re a bit more supportive and as a result they’re heavier. But that being said, the GT-2000 4 is over 5 years old and even without being worn you’re going to be getting significantly less mileage out of the shoe because the cushioning deteriorates with age.
Asyou can see, the main difference between these two shoes is their level of support to prevent overpronation. Runners looking for a moderate level of support will

TheKayano is Asics’ top of the range stability trainer; the Structure is a stable neutral trainer with no medial post. GT 2000 12 9.0. All Asics. Stinson 7 9.0. Zinal 2 7.0. HOKA Gaviota 5 9.0. All Hoka One One. The big difference between the gel of the Kayano and the air bag of the Structure is that the gel can’t be felt underfoot

Afherre sko fra Asics er min absolut favorit Asics Gel Kayano skoen til pronationsløbere. LÌs: Nimbus vs. Cumulus her LÌs Kayano vs. GT-2000 her . Grafik fra Asics selv (Ìldre dato) Asics har offentliggjort en oversigt, som viser de forskellige sko i
TheASICS Gel-Kayano 29 is a premium moderate to high stability daily training shoe for those who want a traditional medial post and a slightly snug upper. A new Flytefoam Blast+ midsole makes for a bouncier ride, while a lighter weight maxes for smoother transitions. Sitting between the older Kayano and GT 2000 series in terms
Findyour tempo with the all-new Asics Gel-Kayano 29. Staying true to the supportive comfort features the Kayano is known for, the addition of updated LITETRUSS™ technology provides even more medial support to prevent the risk of inward rolling, and prompting natural foot alignment. Comfort is immediately delivered upon lacing-up thanks to the
. 356 321 92 276 103 63 297 229 251

asics gel kayano vs gt 2000